I used to walk past empty office buildings in downtown districts and think about the wasted potential. Now when I walk past them I think about the balance sheets.
For the last few years the commercial real estate (CRE) market has been playing a high-stakes game of “Extend and Pretend.” Banks didn’t want to book losses and borrowers didn’t want to hand over keys. So everyone agreed to just push the maturity dates out and hope interest rates dropped or workers returned to the office.
Spoiler alert: Neither happened fast enough.
We are staring down a $1.5 trillion maturity wall by the end of 2026. This isn’t just a headline. It is a transactional reality that is going to change how we audit, how we tax, and how we invest in real estate.
Here is what the data says.
The End of “Extend and Pretend”
The core problem is simple math. Between 2010 and 2020 we were in a Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZERP) era. Money was cheap. Investors bought buildings with 3.5% interest rates assuming values would only go up.
Then the pandemic hit.
Office vacancy is stuck at roughly 19%. This isn’t a cyclical downturn; it’s a structural shift. Hybrid work is here to stay.
Now those loans from 2016 to 2021 are maturing. The cost of capital has effectively doubled and asset values in the office sector have eroded by 20% to 80%.
Refinancing is mathematically impossible for many. If a building generates $1 million in Net Operating Income (NOI) and lenders now require a 12% debt yield, you can only borrow about $8.3 million. If the existing loan is $15 million the borrower has to come up with nearly $7 million in cash just to refinance.
Most don’t have it.
The Audit Battlefield: Going Concern
If you are an auditor this is where things get tense.
Under going concern (for private companies) and AS 2415 (for public issuers) you have to evaluate if there is “substantial doubt” about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In previous years auditors might have accepted a “soft letter” from a broker saying they were working on refinancing. That doesn’t fly anymore.
If a client has a loan maturing within 12 months and no committed takeout financing, that is a prime condition for substantial doubt. I look for three things:
- Asset Liability Mismatch: Does the loan balance exceed the current appraised value?
- Operational Deficit: Is the debt service below 1.0x?
- Market Illiquidity: Are there no comparable sales?
If these exist you need to audit management’s plan. A “mere intent” to refinance is not evidence. You need term sheets or proof of liquid equity. If they can’t provide that you might have to issue a Going Concern qualification.
Be warned: Issuing that qualification can trigger an immediate default on the loan covenants.
The Tax Trap: CODI and Phantom Income
The tax implications here are counterintuitive and frankly dangerous for the unprepared.
When a borrower hands back the keys via a deed-in-lieu or foreclosure it triggers a tax event. But the type of tax event depends entirely on how the debt is treated..
Nonrecourse Debt
If the lender can only take the property, the IRS treats the foreclosure as a sale of the asset for the outstanding loan amount.
- Loan Balance: $20M
- Adjusted Basis: $12M
- Result: $8M Capital Gain.
The borrower lost the building and received zero cash but still owes tax on an $8M gain. This is “phantom income.”
Recourse Debt
If the borrower is personally liable the transaction is split.
- The Sale: Property is treated as sold for its Fair Market Value (FMV).
- Cancellation of Debt Income (CODI): The amount of debt forgiven in excess of FMV is taxed as ordinary income.
This is worse. Ordinary income rates are much higher than capital gains.
The Section 108 Escape Hatch
There are ways out. I dug into the tax code and found the specific exclusions borrowers need to look at:
- Insolvency (Section 108(a)(1)(B)): If the borrower is insolvent immediately before the discharge they can exclude CODI up to the amount of their insolvency.
- Qualified Real Property Business Indebtedness (QRPBI): Solvent taxpayers (except C-Corps) can elect to exclude CODI if they reduce the basis of their depreciable real property.
The catch with QRPBI is that when you eventually sell that property the reduced basis is taxed as “Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain” at 25%. You are essentially trading a tax bill today for a tax bill tomorrow.
The Investment Opportunity: Basis Reset
It’s not all bad news. For those with capital this is a generational buying opportunity.
The report calls this the “Basis Reset.”
Imagine an office building bought in 2019 for $500/sq ft. It needed rents of $60/sq ft to survive. It failed.
Now an investor can come in and buy the non-performing loan or the REO asset for $150/sq ft. At that new, lower basis they can break even at rents of $25/sq ft. They can undercut every other building in the city and still make a 15% return.
We are seeing a rise in “Loan-to-Own” strategies where investors buy the defaulted debt from a bank just to foreclose and take the title.
Key Takeaways
- The Numbers: mature by 2026. Refinancing is often impossible due to lower valuations and higher rates.
- Audit Risk: A maturing loan without a committed refinance term sheet is a major Going Concern trigger.
- Tax Danger: Handing back keys doesn’t mean you walk away free. Watch out for “phantom gain” on nonrecourse debt and ordinary income tax on recourse debt.
- The Strategy: Use Section 108 exclusions (Insolvency/QRPBI) to manage the tax hit.
- The Opportunity: Investors who buy at a reset basis can profit even in a high-vacancy environment.
The era of easy money is over. Now we have to do the actual math.
Want to earn CPE for this topic?
- Compare Options: See how we stack up against others in our 2025 Flexible CPE Guide
- Understand the Format: Read how Nano-Learning works for CPAs.
- Check Your State: Ensure you are compliant with our State Requirements Guide.
- What is EverydayCPE?
Related Courses:
