July’s jobs report came in at -23,000. Economists were expecting a gain of 83,000 to 95,000. It’s not a soft miss it’s a flip from expected growth to an outright loss, and it’s going to shape the next few Fed meetings. Here’s how to actually read it.
The number nobody expected
Nonfarm payrolls fell 23,000 in July, well below the 83,000 to 95,000 economists had penciled in. This is also the first negative print since February, and it lands on top of a downward trend that’s been building since the first quarter. January started strong, February was rough, March bounced back hard, and from there, growth has been decelerating almost every month. The prior-12-month average pace was about 34,000 jobs a month. May, June, and July all came in below that, and July finally broke through zero.
The real story is in the revisions
Remember: July’s -23,000 is a preliminary number. It’s the first read, built off surveys and modeling, not the full picture. And the historical pattern, going back through multiple administrations, so it’s not a partisan thing. The first-reported numbers tend to get revised down as more complete data, like actual tax records, flows in on a lag. This month, May and June were revised down by a combined 103,000 jobs. That’s a big adjustment for two months. It means the labor market was already weaker than everyone thought before July’s number even came out.
One contributor to the overstatement: the model the BLS uses to estimate jobs at newly formed businesses. The so-called birth-death adjustment, assumes a certain number of jobs come with every new company. That assumption was built for a more traditional economy. It doesn’t fully account for the rise of gig work and one-person LLCs, which don’t generate jobs the same way a new storefront or office does. It’s a small mechanical reason the first number tends to run hot.
Meanwhile, inflation hasn’t gone anywhere
While jobs data has been cooling, inflation hasn’t cooperated. Headline CPI sits at 3.5% year-over-year, and core CPI — which strips out food and energy — is at 2.6%. Both are still above the Fed’s 2% target. The gap between headline and core comes down mostly to energy: headline includes it, and with tensions around the Strait of Hormuz pushing energy prices up, that’s been enough to keep the headline number elevated even as core stays comparatively calmer. We haven’t dipped below 2% since the inflation spikes of a few years back, and this report doesn’t change that.
The Fed’s two mandates, pulling apart
The Fed operates under a dual mandate: maximum employment and price stability. A weak jobs report like July’s argues for cutting rates. Lower rates put more cash in the system, which theoretically supports hiring. But inflation still running above target argues for caution, since cutting rates risks reigniting price growth. Right now, both signals are live at the same time, and they’re pointing in opposite directions. That’s what makes the next Fed meeting genuinely hard to call, and it’s why you shouldn’t read either data point in isolation.
Key Takeaways
- A “good” jobs report — strong hiring, low unemployment — is a signal that leans toward the Fed holding or raising rates.
- A “bad” jobs report, like July’s, with a real miss and steep revisions, leans toward cutting rates.
- It’s one signal, not the only one. Inflation is the other half of the dual mandate, and it can point the opposite direction.
- This report specifically: soft jobs, inflation still above target. Read it as tension, not a clean signal either way.
- If you’re working with rate assumptions in any model, this is a good moment to run more than one scenario.
The real skill here isn’t predicting what the Fed will do — it’s knowing how to place the next jobs number, and the next inflation print, against both sides of that mandate before you draw a conclusion.
Want the CPE credit? Take the full lesson on EverydayCPE and earn 0.2 CPE credits: Weak Jobs, Sticky Inflation
Leave a Reply